Supply the United States with renewable energy: A stand-by-State road map

New Hampshire, USA-what it takes to a city, a State, a nation, to convert to 100 percent renewable energy sources? There are many countries with very ambitious targets for 100% powered by renewable energy, type (Islands seem to have a leg). But what about here in the United States, how can this be accomplished for this nation? And since all politics is local (and particularly applies to directives on renewable energy), how could that happen by individual States?

Back in the year 2011 Stanford professor Mark Jacobsen presented, which require that, and followed that with an analysis of how to achieve it in the State of New York. (Our coverage was by the way, is by far the most commented story in recent memory.) Now he extends his analysis in all 50 US States, laying out a resource roadmap, as each of them meet 100 percent of their energy needs (electricity, heating and transport) could through renewable sources of energy to 2050 - except nuclear, ethanol and other biofuels. Keep in mind that none of these calculations are aligned to optimize use of renewable energies for the least cost mix 100 percent. Levelized electricity costs of this mixture renewable energy by the year 2030 expected 11 cents/kWh (including local transfer), fossil energy with additional costs for health and climate will be compared with 20-25 cents / kWh.

Its latest results include two more deep dives for New York, show how they all new energy capacity powered by renewable energy (see the definition above) by 2020, 2030 converted 80-85% of the existing energy and could reach 100 percent by the year 2050. He takes California, percentage renewable energy footprint achieve a 100 with the following portfolio: 55 percent solar (distributed and large-scale, including many CSP), 35 percent wind (on - and offshore), geothermal energy, 5 percent and 4 percent hydroelectric power, a large contribution of energy efficiency. (Mixing with solar wind and combines that with hydro, CSP with storage, largely to smooth frequency issues, he concludes.) Ultimately, that is a net 178,000 permanent jobs avoid $131 billion in annual health-care costs and pay the 631 GW newly installed capacity within six years.

In the U.S. State of Washington, Jacobson et al. calculate how a 2050 fully renewable energy mix: 43 percent wind, 28 percent solar PV, 26 percent hydro, 2% geothermal and half a percent each wave and tidal. New capacity expansions by 137 GW $228 billion cost would be paid but in 13 years. Note that Washington has an abundance of hydroelectric power and has thus an advantage for integrated storage energy consumption match; No new Hydro are necessary (more on that later), but he assumes capacity of existing hydroelectric power stations is updated to improve efficiency.

Proposed change of the percentage distribution of California energy supply for all purposes (power, transport, heating and cooling, industrial) between the conventional fuels and WWS power in the course of time on the basis of the roadmap. Credit: Stanford/Jacobson

Overall, the methods were quite similar: "look at the footprints and areas and how many devices of any kind of that we need," Jacobson explained. Compared to his previous calculations, these new findings extend the time frame, until 2050, instead of only by 2030. Also more are energy buildout to account for installations, like for example an extensive wind since its 2011 study and updated the latest insight into job creation.

He is also posted by the addition of mortality on the basis of air quality data for each State look back calculations, the three years in each district and illustrate how air pollution and its direct connection to mortality reduce renewable energy. He goes into the health-care costs due to air pollution around three per cent of the GDP of the United States says (quick math: the U.S. GDP is about $17 trillion, so the $500 billion in health-care costs). Address could quantify at the subnational level with concrete figures such as renewable energy proves and reduce "a significant burden for the company."

The smoothest pathway, relatively speaking, to 100 percent renewable energy achieve what States have? The key, he says, knocking and improvement of existing large hydro, without coming to any new partner. "Each State with Hydro is inclined, this makes it easier", he says. United States Washington would lead this Pack because of the abundant hydropower resources - up to 30 percent of what they would - need plus a small but growing amount of wind and solar energy. He also finds that the State policy and leadership, "very supporting to change things." Other States, which could use the best Hydro include Idaho and New York. The growing influence of wind energy in some States (Iowa, South Dakota) also helps.

On the other hand it will be so easy a journey into the Southeastern States, to tap the less renewable energy and more about the interconnection. (Note that his estimates restrict non-States, receive renewable energies outside its borders, this brings things like Canadian Hydro in some Northern States.)

Perhaps the biggest takeaway Jacobson updates, is that roughly speaking none of this is new. "We have no new technology to invent it," he says. "We need to get more efficient from the perspective of costs."

View the original article here

Sierra is ranked top 10 greenest universities in the United States

Sierra has America's greenest colleges for seven years ranking was, so we know what a campus can make a difference.

Every "cool schools" issue sent will push we it reminds that are LEED certified buildings equipped with low-flow toilets and equipped with recycling bins push Kohlendioxyd levels lower, and reservoirs are empty and trees longer fuller, landfills.

But what about the students? The most powerful renewable energy resource that is to generate these sites freshly trained young people. And universities Crow, an eco-education - teach young people about the State of our planet - puts us on the right track. Is it, though?

We carried out to find out, and it looks like the answer "Yes".

Only a few universities actually measure whether its environmental curriculum makes a difference after students graduate. But the anecdotal evidence is encouraging: history, according to the story confirmed that the protection of the environment around students sticks while studying with them.

A single class or Professor can activate a life green. He four years at a place that grows an own organic food, runs on alternative energy, compost, limited cars and pursues goals, like a stamp be CO2-neutral or zero-waste goes. In the meantime, adult education centres and vocational schools are fillers until green workforce.

Of course, it is easier to measure brick and mortar heart and mind, so that our ranking is its focus on the more quantifiable aspects of the functioning of schools. The year's list stems from an extensive questionnaire that asks about everything from where a campus draws its energy, whether his landscaping using native plants and the canteens and cafeterias offer recycled napkins.

We have responses from 162 qualified schools, then crunched the numbers. A perfect score would be 1,000. Our top-ranked school charged 850, proving that even the nationwide best has improved.

View the original article here

Tracking and analysis of energy legislation in the United States

A new online database, Center for the new energy economy (CNEE) is created by Colorado State University (CSU) anyone interested in clean energy Act laws in every State in the United States, or also who are policy craft itself.

Bill Ritter, Jr., Director of the CNEE and former Governor of Colorado, legislators clean energy Director of the center of work with States explained that the early work with various States the value of the grouping of the various types of policies, so that everyone may refer to - State decision makers, guidelines or inspiration, group associations, companies and even individuals - from other States formulations in energy policy to learn, such as renewable portfolio standards (RPS). "States are primary mover in clean energy legislation" added CNEE senior Policy Advisor Jeff Lyng.

Enter the advanced energy legislation Tracker monitors approximately 2,300 energy-related bills in all 50 States, including everything that is on a specific state legislative Web site, from the text of bills for audio recordings and committees. Other resources exist that track energy legislation on a subscription/membership model, but the AELTracker is completely free and online. CSU students research legislative papers and it-intensive selection for different categories. Legislation has erupted in 10 categories ranging from power generation to energy efficiency funding. An application programming interface (API) via OpenSpace allows real-time tracking of Bill progress by individual legislators (and stops tracking if they aren't in the session). Users can also a keyword search to specific topics of interest. A keyword search produces more than 300 hits; after 'renewable' "net metering" hoisted 80 bills. Financing and financial incentives affect about 25 percent of all invoices in AELTracker.

In addition, AELTracker offers as only an online research database, the CNEE will group its to illuminate related types of State regulations and analyze common trends in written reports, and podcasts of CNEE policy advisors with the aid of CSU students. AELTracker at the beginning of the month a first report on energy efficiency presented about 200 bills in the policy categories combined represent (resources, cost/benefit, performance contracting, etc.); a further analysis of the financial policy of the Member States was issued earlier this week. A third due in mid-June is the hundreds of "advanced energy" policy promoted nationwide check.

United Kingdom on the verge of an energy Renaissance

Speaking to reporters after he had addressed the House of Commons, said Davey had the Bill "industry and investors that, given what they need consensus and political security."

Previously, he told the Parliament that "the United Kingdom is open to investment in the energy sector".

"The energy bill is a transformation once-in-a-generation from our current market investments bring moving predominantly fossil fuels on a mixture of different CO2 production."

"The law will be the construction of a diverse mix of renewable energy, nuclear power, gas and CCS, protect our economy from energy deficits and clearly deliver new motor vehicle technology our current through the defiance as part of global efforts to combat climate change support."

He said the UK's energy problem "economic opportunity there for the taking." It will supply chains to promote and jobs in all parts of the country, drawing on our technical capabilities and our natural resources, bonding to support Britain's place at the forefront of the development of clean energy."

Some aspects of the heading of the law in the past week the most notable is released, that a carbon emissions target for 2030 would not included - this delayed until 2016 - and would allow for a toll which utilities, ?7 billion by 2020--customers tariffs for low-carbon investments go to increase.

This investment with low CO2 emissions should capture renewable energy and nuclear power, but given the fact that no new nuclear power stations are likely to be online before 2020, was today asked Davey, whether before that most if not all - go this money in renewable energy, especially wind. "Wind gets a lot of it," was his reply.

A key Board of the invoice is called contracts for difference, a long-term agreement between the failure of the other party Government in life and makes company a sum - or base price - guaranteed for electricity. Davey said the exercise price for nuclear-based project, decided with the first project would be to build that the EDF/Centrica Consortium wants that at Hinkley Point in England.

He also said that a decision on the further procedure for shale gas in the UK in the autumn statement Chancellor George Osborne would be revealed next week.

Davey said in addition to his ministers Greg Barker and John Hayes, who was recently nominated to replace Charles Hendry. Conservative MP Hayes sparked fury between green groups and stories of a rift with Liberal Democrat Davey when he was quoted as follows: "enough is enough" for onshore wind in the UK.

This afternoon, said Davey that "Men had differences" still "a possibility that our views had found". He said this "Was legal certainty for investors" and added: "I am, to have John on the team."

When Hayes "Name an onshore wind farm, that you approve" was pressed by a journalist, he instead affirmed Davey of quality assurance, that they worked well together.

As well as the contracts for difference, the formation of the opposing party the most important reforms in the electricity market in the Bill:

A market capacity to enable the capacity auctions as of 2014 for the provision of capacity in winter 2018/19; British company transmission and national grid should be named, to labour market reforms including CfDs electricity supply, manage the market capacity and analysis and evidence to the Government;Enable a final investment decision (FID) enable process allows investment in CO2 projects to submit for early projects, protection against delays to invest in our energy infrastructure-Davey today that there was already much interest in this, with the only company DRAX for a biomass project unmasked;Transitional measures may have to choose renewable investors, between the new system and the existing renewable energy most fossil power plants pollute obligation which remain stable up to 2017.An performance standard (EPS) emissions, to ensure that any new coal-fired power plants have CCS is equipped to be able to operate within the brakes.The Government has already legislated to a minimum carbon price out to establish April 2013.
The Bill is expected to received in 2013 Royal assent.

This story was originally published by power engineering international and was reprinted with permission.

View the original article here

United States' Clean Energy Patents Soar, Report Indicates

The number of clean energy U.S. patents granted in a quarter has reached a new high in the second quarter of 2012, according to the Clean Energy Patent Growth Index. The 786 patents topped the first quarter total of 694, making it the highest tally in any quarter since the firm of Heslin Rothenberg Farley & Mesiti P.C. began tracking clean energy patents in 2002.

The categories monitored are: solar and wind energy; hybrid and electric vehicles (EV); fuel cells; hydroelectric, tidal, and wave power; geothermal energy; biomass and biofuels; and other renewable energy. The most patents (264) were granted for fuel cells, followed by solar (188) and wind (187). Among those granted patents, Toyota topped the list with 46, mainly in fuel cells and EVs. It was followed by GE with 43, mostly wind energy patents, and General Motors with 30 patents concentrated in fuel cells and vehicles. See the Clean Energy Patent Growth Index press release.

View the original article here

A material change: lithium production back to the United States to bring

From 1980 to 2009, global demand has tripled to lithium. This metal is a key material in a number of growing industries, including advanced automotive batteries and electronics. But more specifically, lithium-ion batteries are an essential part of electric cars and other batteries for consumer electronics and used the plug-in electric vehicles on the market today to produce. These batteries have also help a great impact on energy storage infrastructure in the integration of renewable energy sources into the power grid.

After production of the lithium in the early 1990s years world leader, America imported most of its lithium materials and mixtures from South America now.

The Energy Department hopes to bring million federal investment in the communities of Silver Peak, Nevada and Kings mountain (North Carolina) back to the United States with $28,40 on lithium-production lead. Read the complete story in the power blog.

View the original article here

Set United States and Canada next phase of the clean energy dialogue

The Department of energy and Environment Canada released on June 21 the U.S. and Canada clean energy dialogue action plan II, integrate that are next phase of the activities of the two countries together to promote clean energy technologies. The new action plan renewed U.S. and Canadian commitment to create smarter electrical networks and clean energy research and development to promote together. Action Plan II sets to facilitate a greater emphasis on energy efficiency of practices and tools in each country the inclusion of energy-efficient technologies and practices use.

Among the initiatives under the action plan II is an initiative to the US and Canadian regulatory authorities for the provision of offshore renewable energy and technologies be to clarify. The plan also calls for new investigation of the potential of the storage technologies makes. The plan calls also, discussions between the most important Canadian federal ministries and provincial governments, the Department of energy and U.S. national laboratories of options, collect data relating to electric vehicles and recharging infrastructure for North America to harmonise.

President Obama and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper who founded clean energy dialogue in 2009 to promote the development of clean energy technologies to reduce greenhouse gases and combat climate change in both countries. See the DOE press release and the full plan.

View the original article here

United States with a focus on carbon capture technology

WASHINGTON, 26 Aug. UPI)-the US Department of energy, said it would help 16 projects, the ways to capturing carbon dioxide better would develop.

The projects, the dissemination of New Jersey, United States, Washington will $41 million over the next three years. Everyone is focused on ways to improve the existing carbon-capture technology from finding ways to reduce energy and cost penalties.

The Energy Department said that efficient not, since current recording systems for larger power plants large amounts of energy require existing technology.

Objective of the programme is to provide energy losses at the search technology that reach at least 90 percent CO2 removal, the Department said for ways to develop carbon capture.

"Charting a way in the clean coal to achieve our objectives of providing American jobs to create, clean energy and greenhouse gas emissions is essential," Energy Secretary Steven Chu said in a statement. "It helps a leader of the United States in the global clean energy race."

President Barack Obama has a goal with less than 10 pilot projects online by 2016 as part of a plan to develop an efficient CO2 capture technology within the next 10 years set.

View the original article here