Green jobs survey killed as US prepares Government-wide cuts

The move is a harbinger of the program cuts that may occur Government cuts, about the request for the $85 billion in the entire Board of Directors known as sequestration, for the current financial year from US.Their cumulative effect will be not immediately obvious.
"Sequestration is finally swinging into force tomorrow causing flutter flags, soldiers, barefoot and balls in the air, pause to stop" Yair Reiner, analyst at Oppenheimer & co. in New York, said in a note to investors yesterday.

"Well, not exactly" pure said. "As big and painful as the sequestration cuts are likely to be, its impact weeks, months and in some cases takes years to play out."
Barack Obama administration remain Congress and President far apart, how to start the cuts, part of $1.2 trillion in linear spending cuts this year and will be spread over nine years to replace.

Defense programs will absorb half of the cuts. The Pentagon has warned that more than 750,000 civilian employees to take unpaid leave with on average one day per week in furloughs, which would start April 25 can be forced. Today the Defense Department Manager lists of the essential staff send them suggest what by the furloughs.
Effects of Defense

"Not everything that is day one, happen," Pentagon spokesman George Little reporters yesterday. "But we have some very fast decisions on programs that we may again pare."
The biggest decline since 1972 after the Viet Nam war fell defense spending by 22 percent in the fourth quarter of 2012. The cuts are very much felt.

"It absolutely affected us," said Kenneth Moore, a Vice President of Advatech Pacific Inc., a closely held engineering company based in San Bernardino, California, in an interview.
Earlier this year expected to Advatech Pacific in an order of $400,000 for military communications equipment to share. The contract yet still not been let and was cut to "a fraction", Moore said. A third to a half of Advatech Pacific workers encountered, he estimated delays in payment or non-working days without pay.

Loss of jobs
Sequestration cost could be more than 2 million jobs, with about half from defense workers, contractors and their suppliers, according to an estimate in September of Stephen Fuller, an economist with George Mason University Center for regional analysis in Arlington, Virginia.

"The furloughs that what could happen until April, because of the need, hints for the workers concerned offer take place would not" fuller said in an interview yesterday. "Tomorrow or next week will notice the most noncitizens are there a sequester as what is in the newspaper or on television."
In a Feb. 26 E-mail to staff said the Ministry of labour statistics unit a clean energy survey, which included everything from oil lobbyists for drivers of hybrid buses according to the Republicans, would be one of three data reports aborted because of the cuts, according to the person, not identified because the announcement was not official.

Gary Steinberg, a BLS spokesman, referred questions to the Ministry of labour to the discontinued data reports. Labour spokesman Steve Barr is not responded to a request for comment.
'Great loss'

The BLS discontinue reporting on collective redundancies and international comparisons, and trim spending on travel, bonuses and training.
Disappointed clean energy cuts proponents of the wind to say, are the fastest-growing in the United States the Department published its first industry survey in 2012 at least 3.1 million Americans had to find green jobs solar and other renewable energy industries.

"It's a big loss," said bracken Hendricks, senior fellow at the Center for American progress, wrote a book on green energy. "This means that the United States will be flying blind on the growth of a very, very important in the US economy."
If the clean energy growth rate of the other segments of the economy exceeds industry, it still fall short of Obama's goal to set jobs – a point Republican government efforts have stressed at the assault on the economic recovery.

Green energy
During the 2008 campaign, Obama said that 5 million jobs could produce green energy about a decade. Stimulating the economy in 2009, about 90 billion $ in the form provided by loans, grants and tax breaks for clean energy programs, created by the year 2010 the White House has said about 225,000 jobs.

John Berlau, senior fellow at the competitive Enterprise Institute, a free-market research group in Washington, said cutting the programs "Way" and said their absence "leave the Americans no poorer people would."
"It be inherently subjective because that is no standard definition of what for a green job", said Bailey. "If a survey of employment from the premise, start that some jobs are better than others, this is propaganda."

Republicans, including representative Darrell Issa of California, Chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, criticized the Administration for the promise of renewable energy as a source of new jobs advertising.
"This never a real report, but rather propaganda was designed to a misleading political narrative ahead", Issa said in via e-Mail statement. "From the outset it was a misuse of taxpayer money and it is a pity, that it took which sequester the Administration make it to realize that."

Copyright 2013 Bloomberg
View the original article here

Survey: What Will It Take to Make Buildings More Energy Efficient?

In 2010, China built more housing than Spain has homes. That factoid underscores the significance of energy efficiency for buildings in a report released this week by an affiliate of the respected publication, The Economist.

Commissioned by the Global Buildings Performance Network, the report emerged from a survey of real estate and construction executives in the European Union, India, China and the U.S.

It offered promising news: The right policy signals could unleash an international boom in energy efficiency.

What motivates these professionals? Not surprisingly, it’s the potential they see to cut costs. They “are ready to go deep and are waiting for the right policy signals that can scale up energy efficiency in the sector,” said GBPN in the report.

Although barriers exist, business leaders in building and real estate already are pursuing a range of efficiency measures. The survey found that:

Energy usage is important for most of the companies and is key factor in investment decisions to 63 percent of those surveyed. Companies that describe themselves as “financially successful” rated energy particularly high.Lighting retrofits scored high among actions companies are taking. About 57 percent are replacing lighting , 50 percent HVAC systems and 50 percent building insulation.Forty percent are reconfiguring building layout to take advantage of natural light.Energy efficiency is a risk management tool for 69 percent, a sign that they have a sophisticated understanding of energy.
Not all of the news was good, however. Companies are unaware of the actual costs of their energy use. Less than a third have commissioned energy audits for their buildings. Further, two thirds of those surveyed overestimate the cost of energy efficient construction.

A surprising 75 percent saw benefit in energy regulation and described lack of enforcement as a problem. The solution? Not too much carrot and not too much stick, concluded the survey report.

“While the survey shows that most companies prefer carrots, at some point governments also need to wield the stick,” the report said. “Striking the right balance between incentives and restrictions is not easy. Excessive red tape and mixed messages are costly to business and slow the adoption of more efficient technologies. The market needs clear long-term signals, rational expectations and opportunities for a reasonable return on investment.”

The Economist Intelligence Unit surveyed 423 senior executives from the real estate and construction industries in the summer 2012. About 27 percent of those surveyed came from the US, 24 percent from the European Union, 25 percent from China and 24 percent from India. All of those surveyed worked in operations, strategy or finance. More than half were C-level executives or above and nearly half from businesses with more than $500 million in global annual revenue. The full report, “Energy Efficiency and Energy Savings: A View from the Building Sector,” is available for download here.

Elisa Wood is a long-time energy writer. See more of her work at RealEnergyWriters.com.

View the original article here