Showing posts with label Texas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Texas. Show all posts

Sunday, December 09, 2012

Largest Texas wind power entry operator sets

Sunday, December 09, 2012
The large operators of Texas reported this month a record for wind power generation.
Credit: Todd Spink

The electric reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), state the largest operators have achieved a new State record for wind power generation at the 10 wind power output 8.521 megawatts (MW), almost 26% workload currently represents, surpassing the current record of more than 150 MW. ERCOT manages the electrical flow of Texas 23 million customers in 85% of State electric consumers.

Almost 7,000 MW of new record include electricity from wind farms West Texas wind, followed by more than 1,100 MW of wind farm along the coast of Texas. ERCOT has more than 10,000 MW of wind power capacity with almost 21,000 MW of additional wind generation in the year under review for development. Completion of the high-voltage transmission projects until end of 2013 improved the ERCOT wind power to the metropolitan areas of West Texas moved ability where the grid demand. See the press release of ERCOT.

View the original article here

0 коммент.

Sunday, October 14, 2012

Energy market uncertainty boiling up in Texas

Sunday, October 14, 2012
To resolve the problem, the Commission of Texas (PUCT) public utility has a set of rules, the increase in the maximum amount, the market pricing pays scenarios for power during the shortages include the system-wide offer CAP (SWOC) adopt - called. On August 1, 2012 the SWOC for the second time this year charged and now sits at $4,500 per megawatt-hour (MWh). While some concerns this could be centered to market manipulation, the PUC appear aims to improve "price signals investment forward for new speaker generation". In fact, ERCOT published analysis on the impact of the rule changes on speaker net margins (PNMs) in 2011. As shown below PNMs would have improved 42% in the year 2011 in the new rule changes, which was currently in force ($ 4,500 / MWh SWOC).

Energy market uncertainty boiling up in Texas

Given the difficulties in forecasting of futures spot market prices and market behaviour, is wide disagreement on the rules proposed levels and implications. Commissioner Anderson shows map against increasing the SWOC fires again so soon after it a recent report by the Brattle Group was found during that ERCOT would still "several thousand megawatts [demand response] under a $9,000 cap price need."

Although constructing discussions of big market a challenge could changes could discourage investment due to uncertainty, overlooking ERCOT the construct of the market itself. The construct of "just energy" pays only resources for the energy and costs services that they provide, not installed capacity, makes it difficult for investors to calculate the bankability of such assets, rarely called according to Midwest ISO discussion paper on the adequacy of the resource for the Midwest ISO energy market.

Earlier comments filed, who with the PUCT the multi-state energy company Exelon suggested, "there is no perfect adjustment to the energy market [because it] is inherently short term and volatile and creation of investment is generally long-term and capital-intensive."

Former DOE Secretary Susan Tierney believes that markets the capacity make more sense. In a recent keynote address at the Gulf Coast power Association she noticed "a competitive market allows determining the capacity as efficiently as possible... and allows time for the winner of the auction capacity online to bring their resources." She went on to say: "A market capacity... can induce distributed generation."

But what markets such as ERCOT with "just energy"? Can they promote not distributed generation (DG)?

Only energy markets prefer clearly attributable to shareholders makes the spot prices explode. But the uncertainty of this occurrence favours a more risk-averse--and therefore more protracted--investment strategy that may include the development of small, scalable, load following solar generation. As evidenced by the lack of speaker dangerous fumes in ERCOT market uncertainty is antithesis to the long-term, capital intensive projects.

Especially should follow the unintended market the PUCT of new rules will not be ignored. To improve the intention may be speaker net margins, though, the rules could actually encourage more demand-side circumcision instead at the end. Which means that flexibility is key. Who can most effectively to predict or react fastest to the new rules are those ensure itself a beautiful Texas size payday.

This article appeared originally at the NREL renewable energy finance and was republished with permission.

View the original article here

0 коммент.

Sunday, September 02, 2012

Energy market uncertainty boiling up in Texas

Sunday, September 02, 2012
To resolve the problem, Commission of Texas (PUCT) has a set of rules, the increase in the maximum amount, the market of public utility pricing pays scenarios for power during shortages include the system-wide offer CAP (SWOC) adopted - called. On August 1, 2012 the SWOC for the second time this year raised and now sits at the $4,500 per megawatt-hour (MWh). While some concerns this could lead, centered to market manipulation, the PUC will appear goals to improve will "signals for new Peaker generation investment forward". In fact, ERCOT published analysis on the impact of rule changes on Peaker net margins (PNMs) in 2011. As shown below PNMs would have improved 42% in the year 2011 in the new rule changes, which was currently in force ($ 4,500 / MWh SWOC).

Energy market uncertainty boiling up in Texas

Given the difficulties in forecasting of future scenarios spot market prices and market behaviour, is great disagreement on both of the rules proposed level and implications. Commissioner Anderson shows map against increasing the SWOC fires again so soon after it a recent report by the Brattle Group was found while ERCOT would still "several thousand megawatts [demand response] under a $9,000 cap price need."

Although discussion of the large market construct a challenge for ERCOT the construct of the market itself could changes could discourage investment because of insecurity. The construct "just energy" pays only resources for the energy and related services that they deliver, not installed capacity, makes it difficult for investors to calculate the bankability of such assets, rarely shouting adequacy for the Midwest ISO energy market according to Midwest ISO discussion paper resource.

Previous comments stored with the PUCT of the proposed multi-state energy company Exelon, "there is no perfect adaptation to the only energy market [because it] is inherently short-term and volatile and preparation of the investment is generally long term and capital intensive."

Former DOE Secretary Susan Tierney believes that markets the capacity make more sense. In a recent keynote address on the Gulf Coast power Association she noticed "a competitive market enables the determination of the capacity as efficiently as possible... and is the winner of the auction for capacity, to bring their resources online." She went on to say: "A market capacity... can induce distributed generation."

But what markets such as ERCOT with "just energy"? Can they promote not distributed generation (DG)?

Only energy markets prefer clearly redistribution makes with the spot prices explode. But the uncertainty of this occurrence favours a more risk-averse - and therefore longer-lasting - investment strategy that may include the development of small, scalable, load following solar generation. As evidenced by the lack of Peaker dangerous fumes in ERCOT market uncertainty is antithesis to the long-term, capital intensive projects.

In particular should follow the unintended market the PUCT of new rules are not ignored. To improve the intention might be Peaker net margins, although the rules could encourage actually circumcision instead more demand at the end. Which means that flexibility is key. Who will be the most effective way to predict or react fastest to the new rules are those ensure themselves a beautiful Texas size payday.

This article was published originally at the NREL renewable energy finance and was republished with permission.

View the original article here

0 коммент.

Monday, May 30, 2011

A further power outage affects Texas City refineries

Monday, May 30, 2011

A broken insulator is for another makes failure of the Texas city dwellers and refineries is held responsible.

Power return to the is some refineries in Texas City, according to the Galveston County daily news.

Affected refineries were Valero Energy Corp., BP Plc, Sterling Chemicals Inc. and Marathon Oil Corp.

This is a second time in the month, the refineries had to deal with power outages.

bizWatch

For followed all of your company news to your personalized dashboard.

To access all the advantages of the BizWatch and receive a weekly email with aggregated news on all the companies that you are following, please enter your e-Mail address.


View the original article here


0 коммент.

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Losses cause scare in Texas refinery

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

TEXAS CITY, Texas - people of this Township oil on the Gulf of Mexico were to forced operations in several locations remain disturbed in their homes Tuesday after power outages and a brief fire caused refinery a BP PLC notorious for an explosion in the year 2005, the 15 workers killed.


Emergency Management asked officials for fear of possible harmful emissions to stay inside inhabitants in the city and turn their air conditioning Monday lost after power to the BP site at about 11 am was and a petrochemical plant owned by Dow Chemical.


TXCITYSUB


Associated press flares a BP plant in Texas City, Texas burn late Monday. Failures beat two other oil refineries in the city.


The order was within remain on 3 hours Tuesday after the fire at BP crude oil distillation plant without any injuries put out was abolished. But officials acknowledged that two other refineries had no electricity and again the "shelter in place" recommendation as a precaution. The order was finally high noon Tuesday when power was restored, said Bruce Clawson, Texas City Director of emergency management.


Texas City, an industrial suburb of Houston, with a population of about 50,000, contains one of the largest concentrations of refineries and petrochemical plants in the world. As residents and workers their normal routine, company again and local officials were still sorting exactly like the fire broke out, and why the plants lost power.


The smell of sulfur awoke late Monday night, Fabian Irish. It was so strong, the 29-year old said it was "like a person of a latrine kicked." Mr Irish and his girlfriend, Pam Stinson, then heard a series of "Boom." Out of their House, just a few blocks north of the BP refinery, you saw that flares had set the sky on fire by the chimneys. "My whole backyard was orange," said Mrs Stinson.


Texas New Mexico power co., which operates the power line, which is in Texas City, said four separate problems Monday night in his customer equipment and an early Tuesday morning in their own facilities occurred. Caused, that makes you lost in a refinery owned by Valero Energy Corp.


TNMP blame lack of rain for the problem in its own equipment, say instead that a mixture of food grade salt and pollution, which have usually washed would accumulate on electrical equipment had.


"April has been extremely dry, which led to this construction" spokeswoman Cathy Garber said in an e-Mail. "High humidity combined with the establishment of residue, appears late in the night and this morning, the error raised have."


The other failures found in equipment include the refineries and industrial plants, according to TNMP and State authorities. TNMP said it knew exactly what causes these failures, which happens when the refineries owned by BP and Marathon Oil Corp., and the Dow Chemical plant. The company said that they were investigated the cause of the failures. Dow said it had created "no reason to believe" them on the site.


Terry Hadley, spokesman for the public utilities Commission of Texas, said that "chemical gunk on insulators" on TNMP and refinery owned equipment is something the utilities manage sprayers, if there not enough rain. Isolators keep energy flowing lines, but lines can error, if enough debris to an alternative path for electricity to provide.


BP Texas City refinery is the third largest in the country. The 2005 explosion it injured 170 people in addition to the worker deaths. Amanda wrote, a Texas native, who can see the refinery of their house spent Monday night their children comfort by the sounds of the refinery, fear were city.


"It was bad enough that my children all night, when the refineries that were questions to blow up," she said.


View the original article here


0 коммент.